Here is an email (slightly redacted to protect the identity
of the sender) which is fairly typical of the questions I have fielded on this
topic:
Thank you for your
interesting blog posts that you have been writing. I am studying Orthodox Christian
Theology and I have been sober for a number of years. One thing is a big
question for me: Is it possible to be an Orthodox Priest and a
recovering alcoholic? I know that in communion wine and bread are transformed
into Blood and Body of Christ. But if priest is an alcoholic and he has to
empty the chalice after the Communion: Is there any risk that he starts to
drink again? What is your experience on this subject?
I’m going to go through this entire subject
just so you can all see how this has worked in the past. There are a number of Orthodox Priests that I
know that are in recovery both from alcoholism and other addictions. Yes, clergy get addicted… we are fallen
humans and share the same problems with our people.
You may say, “But, isn’t that hypocritical
for a priest, who is supposed to preach about belief in God and maintaining
morality, to fail on both accounts and become an addict?” That’s because you’ve missed the real point:
Christianity is about repentance, not about perfect keeping of the Law. You want law-keeping, become a Jew or a
Moslem. Christians know the Law, but
repent for their violations of it.
Priests, therefore, are called to preach
repentance. Therefore, their real role
is to demonstrate repentance. If the
priest can’t repent, he is a failure.
Repentance is an ongoing process, and there
are plenty of people who start off on the right track, but lose sight of God
along the way. This happens to priests,
and then they run the risk of becoming addicted. After all, the job is emotionally taxing… you
never really go home from the work and leave it all behind. It is part of your every waking hour, and if
you don’t have a solid spiritual life, the stress will crush the priest and his
family. I’ve seen that happen more times
than I care to count.
So, what about the priest who becomes an
alcoholic, or the man who is considering the priesthood and is an addict. Is being an alcoholic an impediment?
I’ve posted elsewhere that my views of
addiction have changed in recent years.
I’ve come to believe that the reason that the Fathers don’t discuss
addiction as we do is because they see what we call ‘addiction’ as part of a
whole spectrum of disorders they call the passions. Addiction is the ‘final stage’ of the
Passions, when the human will is utterly compromised.
Sin compromises our will, and the
temptation of sin has varying degrees of attractiveness which can compromise
our resistance. Think of magnets: some
are stronger than others. When you think
of addiction, think of metals: some are more prone to being magnetized than
others.
The priest who is addicted ‘dies’ as a
priest when his God shifts from the Trinity to the bottle. That’s it.
A drinking priest is a dead priest.
However, when he repents and makes those first steps out of the pig-pen
of addiction towards God and recovery, his priesthood is restored like the son-ship
of the Prodigal Son. He becomes
alive. This does happen, and most
recovering priests actually come away as better servants: they are more empathetic
and can relate better to the suffering of others.
The seminarian in recovery is in much the
same boat. He knows the struggles of his
people because he himself has had to struggle with the worst. He has been humiliated and shamed by his
disease. If he is honest, then this
experience with strengthen and enliven his ministry.
There are a few practical matters:
1)
The Bishop must know
A seminarian and an addicted priest must be
forthright with the Bishop about the disease and what he is doing to maintain
his sobriety. This will help one be on
one’s best behavior… because we always act better when someone else is
watching. If there is a relapse, the
Bishop will understand.
Some may say, “But, my Bishop is
close-minded and won’t understand.” My
advice: get another Bishop. Here in the
US, that’s easy. The thing is that if
you relapse and he does not know about your disease, then you have defrauded
him into ordaining you and you don’t deserve to be a priest. Don’t live in fear, and never let fear
dictate your decisions.
Besides, do you really want to work for a
Bishop who looks at his people with addictions as being so ‘horrible’ that they
cannot serve God? Canonical impediments
are about the things one has actually done, whereas addiction is about
disposition. If the Bishop has an
allergic reaction to the topic, go elsewhere.
There are plenty of Bishops who will gladly bring on board a sober man
who can help him with the many addicts that are part of diocesan communities.
2)
Communion wine isn’t the problem, spirituality is
There are alcoholic priests who abuse
communion wine. I’ve seen it with my own
eyes: I watched a senior priest down two glasses of strong red wine before
liturgy and perfectly serve without any indication he was even buzzed.
There are also lay people who are afraid of
even the tiny amount of alcohol in the communion spoon. The allergy to alcohol in alcoholism is not
like going into anaphylactic shock from peanuts. One drop is not going to send you over the
edge. Otherwise, you’d never be able to
drink a glass of orange juice (it has alcohol because it is made from spoiled
oranges that have begun to ferment).
The allergy of alcoholism really requires
enough alcohol to register on the central nervous system. This means that consuming a large chalice
full of the typical communion wine is problematic.
The solution: who says you need to pour
500mL of wine into the chalice every liturgy?
If you know how many people will take communion, then pour just
enough. By the time you add water and
distribute communion (not to mention leaving it out during that time for some
of the alcohol to evaporate), most of the alcohol will be gone.
If you cannot avoid pouring a great deal,
then get the Bishop’s blessing to have a pious lay person who can drink off the
wine. I’ve used that solution, and I can
finish consuming without any worries.
Do NOT make the mistake of thinking that
the Anaphora somehow mystically whisks away the alcohol from the wine. It does not.
3)
Alcoholism as a disease is not a canonical impediment
Being a sober alcoholic is not a canonical
impediment, but drinking and refusing treatment is. I have even visited dioceses where the Bishop
admitted that almost a quarter of his priests are chronic problemed drinkers,
yet he cannot remove them until he has enough canonical evidence that the
priest is no longer functional.
A sober alcoholic Priest is not obligated
to tell everyone in his parish that he is an alcoholic. Most people would not even know how to react,
unless they themselves are struggling with addiction, in which case such a
revelation would be a relief and a hope.
But, being an addict is not something to put on your business card or
publish in the bulletin.
So long as the disease is being treated and
relapses are not an ongoing event, a Bishop will likely not remove a talented (and
recovering) alcoholic priest. To be honest,
I have seen Bishops excuse priests who not only had public and private alcohol
episodes, but even cheated on their wives, stole money, violated confessions,
divorced… Yes, Bishops do let priests ‘get away’ with these kinds of sins, but
so long as the priest can continue to be an effective tool of the Church.
If he repents, and can continue to serve,
then very often a Bishop will keep a good priest who fails.
The Church does not condone the immorality
of anyone, but let’s look at it this way: if the Bishop determines that this
priest will never transgress that way again, then why should he not do as the
Lord did to the woman caught in adultery: go and sin no more! Was Christ being cruel, or did He expect the
woman to not sin anymore?
This is not a ticket to hedonism, but a
tool: the Church preaches forgiveness, and sometimes even exercises it with
clergy. So long as the priest’s
continued service is not a disruptive source of scandal, it does no good to
throw out an experienced clergyman for the sake of keeping the Law.
How this is done is best left to the
Bishops.
But, do not think that alcoholism or
addiction is a blockage to ministry in the Church. It can be, in fact, a powerful tool in
helping others, so long and there is honesty and openness.
No comments:
Post a Comment